Increasing colorectal cancer in the young population and tailoring of the colorectal cancer screening recommendations in subpopulation: a retrospective single-center study.

PURPOSE: The United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) newly drafted recommendations for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening age in average-risk individuals decreased to 45 years from 50 years. This study evaluates the change in the incidence of CRC, compares the demographic characteristics, characteristics of CRC, survival, and factors affecting the survival of younger (< 50 years) with the older (> 50 years) CRC-diagnosed population of Boston Medical Center (BMC). Also tailors the screening recommendations of CRC based on subpopulations. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted from 2004 to 2019 at BMC who underwent colonoscopy, to see newly diagnosed CRC. The analysis was done in R studio version 1.2.5033. RESULTS: The incidence rate of CRC is increasing in the younger population. The CRC in younger population was 350 and older was 2019. The most prevalent site among the younger population was rectum (33.33%), and most of the CRC were diagnosed at an advanced stage. Hispanics were less likely to be diagnosed with CRC in older age group (OR= 0.468, 95% CI 0.285, 0.796). Lower BMI was associated with a higher risk of mortality (p= 0.012). There was no difference in survival in younger and older populations. CONCLUSIONS: CRC is increasing in the younger population, and Hispanics are diagnosed with CRC usually at a younger age. Early screening in young populations with average risk and even earlier screening in high-risk populations like Hispanics is warranted for timely recognition for prevention, early management, and reduction of mortality.

Resuscitation research involving vulnerable populations: are additional protections needed for emergency exception from informed consent?

The application of basic ethical principles to resuscitation research and other research in the emergency and critical care settings presents a particular challenge. The emergency exception from informed consent (EFIC) rule (21 CFR 50.24 and 45 CFR 46.101[i]) addresses a particular vulnerability: that which occurs when persons cannot consent due to acute loss of decisional capacity. The question arises as to whether populations defined as "vulnerable" are unique within studies to which EFIC applies. This report details the proceedings of a breakout session of the 2005 Academic Emergency Medicine Consensus Conference, "Ethical Conduct of Resuscitation Research," that dealt with this issue. Topics addressed were 1) the applicability of the term "vulnerable" in research using EFIC; 2) the relationship between vulnerability, exploitability, and capacity; 3) the significance of vulnerability in research design; 4) the adaptation of the informed consent process to the emergency setting; and 5) the role of the institutional review board. Ten consensus recommendations emerged from the discussion. Of particular importance was the endorsement of the idea that research using EFIC is as important in vulnerable populations as in the general population and that the systematic exclusion of vulnerable populations from resuscitation research is inappropriate.

Potential diversion rates associated with prehospital acute myocardial infarction triage strategies.

Thisstudy examines the potential number of patients who would be diverted from hospitals without percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) capability, to centers with this capability, as a result of prehospital triage strategies for patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction (AMI). All patients with AMI admitted during a 1-year study period at two urban hospitals without PCI capability were identified through a prospectively maintained AMI registry. Pertinent clinical data were extracted from the AMI registry and patients' medical records. Patients were considered to have been eligible for prehospital diversion to a PCI center if they had ischemic symptoms of greater than 20 min and less than 24 h duration, and electrocardiographic changes consistent with ST elevation AMI (STEMI) were noted at the time of Emergency Department (ED) arrival or before arrival. There were 176 patients with AMI identified. One hundred three patients were transported to the ED by Emergency Medical Services (EMS). Of these, 39 had a clinical presentation and diagnostic EKG evidence of STEMI on ED arrival. Implementation of a prehospital triage strategy for patients with suspected STEMI may result in the diversion of 22% of patients with AMI from hospitals without PCI capability, assuming perfect specificity of prehospital triage. Actual implementation of a prehospital AMI diversion protocol may have an even greater impact on nonreceiving hospitals.

The effects of consecutive night shifts on neuropsychological performance of interns in the emergency department: a pilot study.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: We obtain preliminary information on the neuropsychological performance of house officers at the beginning and end of a shift while they worked consecutive night shifts in the emergency department. METHODS: We prospectively studied interns working 12-hour consecutive night shifts in an urban Level I trauma center ED. All consecutive non-emergency medicine interns rotating for 1 month were eligible except those older than 40 years and those with sleep disorders or depression (identified by using the Profile of Mood Scale, Sleep Diagnostic Questionnaire). We tested research subjects at the beginning of a day shift and at the beginning and end of night shifts 1 and 3 of 4 consecutive night shifts at times of estimated baseline wakefulness (10 PM) and maximum fatigue (3 AM). We used 3 standardized neuropsychological tests: (1) Delayed Recognition Span Test (visual memory capacity); (2) Continuous Performance Test (attentional function, vigilance); and (3) Santa Ana Form Board Test (psychomotor speed, coordination). We analyzed data with mixed-model analysis, with research subject as a random effect. RESULTS: Thirteen interns were eligible, and 1 declined. Twelve interns (6 men and 6 women; age range 25 to 35 years) were enrolled. The Delayed Recognition Span Test (number correct before first error) revealed significant deterioration from the beginning of the shift to the end of the shift (mean difference -2.2; 95% confidence interval -3.1 to -1.3). This represents an 18.5% decrease in visual memory capacity. There were no significant differences found for the other tests. CONCLUSION: Interns working nights demonstrated a significant reduction in visual memory capacity across the night shift. Research involving neuropsychological performance during night shifts in the ED is important. It might provide valuable insights into ways to improve our performance during night shifts.

Evaluating acceptance and understanding of risk in the emergency department: are all risk statements created equally?

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether mathematically equivalent but conceptually different presentations of risk from radioactive isotope exposure might affect the rate of agreement to participate in a hypothetical research study. METHODS: This was a prospective study of consenting English-speaking subjects more than 18 years of age who were asked whether they would agree to participate in a mock study when presented with six mathematically equivalent statements of research-related risk. Participants were classified as recognizing the equivalence of the risk statements if they accepted all or refused all of the risk statements. RESULTS: Three hundred forty-six subjects were enrolled. There were 55 subjects (16%; 95% CI = 12% to 20%) who refused all of the six risk statements, and 23 participants (6.7%; 95% CI = 4% to 9%) who accepted all of the given risk statements. Most of the participants (77%; 95% CI = 73% to 82%) did not recognize that the six risk statements were equivalent and agreed to some, or did not understand some of the risk statements. In stepwise multivariate logistic regression, being white, being of older age, and having higher education were associated with a higher likelihood of accepting or rejecting all six of the risk statements. CONCLUSIONS: Ethnicity, age, and education affected whether patients recognized the equivalence of six risk statements for a hypothetical study of low-dose radiation. Risk acceptance may be more likely when familiar concepts are used to express research risks. Researchers must focus on strategies that enhance the understanding of research risks and address the reasons for nonparticipation by subjects who are younger, of different ethnic or cultural background, or of lower education.